Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Forrer v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1909No. Nos. 16,091—(32)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Information by the attorney general on behalf of Henry W. Forrer for a writ of quo warranto directed to Hugh -T. McIntosh to show canse by what authority he claimed to act as sheriff of the county of Koochiching. On the return day of the writ the respondent filed his answer, certain facts were stipulated and a referee was appointed to take testimony, which was returned to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

By the Governor’s proclamation (Laws 1907, p. iii) Ronald S. McDonald, Neis L. Olson, Fred Smith, Charles M. Bowman, and Hugh T. McIntosh were appointed to constitute the first board of county commissioners of Koochiching county. P. A. Walsh was the sheriff of the county during 1907, and at the general election held November 3, 1908, was elected for the term commencing on the fourth day of January, 1909; but he died November 4, 1908. Respondent, McIntosh, resigned his office as county commissioner on November 6, 1908, and on November 9,1908, the remaining members of the board appointed him…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lull v. FrizzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Manley v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Childs v. O'LearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Baxter v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Bland v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Smallwood v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Byrne & Speed Coal Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Tooele County v. De La MareUtah Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API