Legal Opinion

Badger v. Benfield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8524SC295Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs argue that their complaint is legally sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the court erred in dismissing it. A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of his claim. Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970). In considering a motion made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), the allegations of the complaint are to be taken as true. Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 289 N.C. 71, 221…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Heaton v. . HeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Johnson Cotton Company v. HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Manufacturing Co. v. . HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API