Rockaway, C., Corp. v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The bill is filed to compel the defendants to provide, or restore for the benefit and use of complainant, a suitable wagonway or crossing over defendants' railroad where it intersects complainant's lands. The matter is now before the court on the return of an order requiring the defendants to show cause why a preliminary mandatory injunction should not issue to compel the defendants to restore a wagonway or crossing which is said to have been provided by the Morris and Essex Railroad Company many years ago, and the use of which was exercised by the intersecting landowners up to February 1st,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mason v. RossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- McCran v. Public Service Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Green v. Morris & Essex RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1858
- Imperial Realty Co. v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Todd v. StaatsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Asher v. IngelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981