Imperial Realty Co. v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 78 N. J. Mg. (8 Buch.) 170.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of tlio court was delivered by
G-ummere, Chief-Justice.
The complainant, the Imperial Realty Company, by its bill in this case seeks an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with its free use and enjoyment of an alleged right of way over lands of the defendant, the right of way being, as is claimed, an alley twenty feet in width, located at the rear of the *169complainant’s land. The defendant, by its answer, denies the existence of such an alley, or that the complainant has any right of way over, or easement in, the land sought to be covered by it.
It is the settled law…
2Cited by7 opinions
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- National Silk Dyeing Co. v. GrobartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Dvorin v. BayonneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Poulos v. Dover Boiler and Plate FabricatorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Scott v. ScottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.