International Harvester Co. v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw
Plaintiff in error’s intestate, Lorenz Mirocha, was employed by the International Harvester Company as a molder, assisting in molding parts for engines, in the course of which employment it became his duty to adjust and otherwise deal with certain clamps on a molding machine. In this particular part of his work it was necessary for him to stand in a stooped or bent-over position. The molding machine was operated by a crew of five men, among whom was one Pinícola, whose duty it was, among other things, to use an air hose, carrying compressed air at eighty-five pounds’ pressure, to blow the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- W. M. Allen Son. & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Brake Shoe Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Thurber v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Gates Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Sizemore v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.