Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Wakefield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 1, 1984No. 159, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The controversy in this case is over the validity of a Baltimore County charter amendment requiring resolution of labor disputes, involving county-employed fire fighters, through binding arbitration. The specific issue before us is whether the charter amendment constitutes proper “charter material” under Art. XI-A of the Maryland Constitution as construed in Cheeks v. Cedlair Corp., 287 Md. 595, 415 A.2d 255 (1980).

In July 1982, petitions proposing an amendment to the Baltimore County Charter were submitted to the Board of Supervisors of Elections for Baltimore County which,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Cheeks v. Cedlair Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. McCrory Corp. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Tyma v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Board of Supervisors of Elections v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Sugarloaf Citizens Assoc., Inc. v. GudisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API