Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWright, J.
I
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on appellants’ claim that appellees’ conduct was willful and wanton. For that reason I concur that this action should be remanded to the trial court. I also agree that the court of appeals was correct in determining that appellees were not entitled to summary judgment on the claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and with the position expressed in footnote 7 that no conflict exists between this action and Swift v. Two Hundred Place (Nov. 13, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 51320, unreported,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Winterstein v. WilcomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.