Legal Opinion

City Loan System, Inc. v. Nordquist

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 14, 1933No. 431PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is readily found as a fact that Anna Bergquist did not sign the note in question containing the warrant of attorney upon which the judgment was entered and also that her name was not placed on said note by her authority.

There is no testimony whatever upon which a different finding could be based unless it be the mere circumstance that Anna Bergquist was living with her husband and that he presented the note to the bank and received the proceeds.

That, of course, is not sufficient to overcome the direct and positive denials.

It is also found that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Boone v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Frankel v. SatterfieldSuperior Court of Delaware · 1890
  5. Wilmer v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Tweed v. LocktonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
  3. Smulski v. H. Feinberg Furniture Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. King v. CordreySuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Baio v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API