Legal Opinion

Wilmer v. Epstein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1911PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Niles, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The object of this suit is to restrain the enforcement of a judgment alleged to be void for want of jurisdiction. It is stated in the bill of complaint filed by the appellees in the Court below that they are co-partners trading as Baltimore Bargain House, Jacob Epstein, proprietor; that a certain John O’Grady was in the year 1910, and still remains, in their employ, at a salary of $13.00 per week, as packer in their millinery department; that his wages were always paid him weekly and never accumulated, and they at no time owed him for more than one week’s services; that on or about August 2,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kochman v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hanley v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  5. Clark v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  2. Thomas v. HardistyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Finch v. LVNV Funding LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Leichtman v. KoonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Little v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API