Legal Opinion

Dawdy v. Holt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1984No. 83-223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The only issue in this case concerns the validity of a tax deed to oil, gas and mineral interests and whether we should overrule our decision in Garvan v. Potlatch Corp., 278 Ark. 414, 645 S.W.2d 957 (1983).

This case comes to us on appeal from a motion for summary judgment that was granted by the chancellor. The appellee, Mamie Ware Holt, owned a mineral interest in the Chalybeat Springs Unit in Columbia County. The appellee failed to make tax payments on the mineral interest for the years 1979 through 1982. In 1980, after proper advertisement, appellant James H.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorkin v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Garvan v. Potlatch Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Stienbarger v. KeeverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Selrahc Ltd. Partnership v. SEECO, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Anadarko Land Corporation F/K/A Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation, and Three Sisters, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Family Tree Corporation, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Anadarko Land Corporation F/K/A Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation, and Three Sisters, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Family Tree Corporation, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API