Sorkin v. Myers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.
The controversy involves undivided mineral interests that had been severed from the fee, and had forfeited for taxes. Act 221 of 1929, Ark. Stat’s, § 84-203. Plaintiffs in six suits alleged invalid assessments and void sales, and asked that deeds issued by the Land Commissioner be cancelled. The Chancellor found, among other vices, that due process had been denied, hence sales by the Collector were unauthorized. Since we have concluded that assessment methods, the manner of recording assessments, and faulty administrative procedure in dealing with the properties…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rives v. Woodruff CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smiley v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- May v. Akers-LangSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Schuman v. Ouachita CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Gilbreath V. Union BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Adams v. BruderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.