Stienbarger v. Keever
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Bose Smith, J.
This is a suit by the appellee to cancel a tax title to the leasehold interest in the oil and gas underlying 160 acres of land. This interest was sold to the State for nonpayment of taxes in 1934, and the appellant has acquired the tax title. The chancellor held the sale void and granted the relief sought by the .complaint.
The appellee relies principally upon a defect in the sale similar to the defects considered in Sorkin v. Myers, 216 Ark. 908, 227 S. W. 2d 958, and Davis v. Stonecipher, 218 Ark. 962, 239 S. W. 2d 756. In those cases it was shown that severed mineral interests were listed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sorkin v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Davis v. StonecipherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smiley v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Adams v. BruderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Selrahc Ltd. Partnership v. SEECO, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Garvan v. Potlatch Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Dawdy v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.