Legal Opinion

People ex rel. J.A.U. v. R.L.C.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 28, 2002No. 01SC530PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. INTRODUCTION

This case requires us to decide whether a man, RL.C., who has previously admitted paternity and been adjudicated the father of a child may, eleven years after the judgment has entered, obtain genetic tests that he believes will assist him in challenging that judgment of paternity. We conclude that he may not.

The trial court denied R.L.C.'s motion for genetic tests, reasoning that Colorado's statutory scheme does not provide for genetic tests after a final judgment of paternity has entered. The court of appeals reversed in In re J.A.U., 33 P.3d 1237, 1238-89 (Colo.App.2001),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Knapp v. KnappOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Goodman Associates, LLC v. WP Mountain Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. De Avila v. Estate of DeHerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In re the Marriage of RoddyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. SR Condominiums, LLC v. K.C. Construction, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Mishkin v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API