Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Synergy Productions Ltd.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 1990No. 8338PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff, Roderick G. Taylor, doing business as Woodbury Ski and Racket, appeals from the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion to dissolve a prejudgment remedy for failure to serve the defendants with the notice of rights required by General Statutes § 52-278e (b). The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in granting the motion for the following reasons: (1) a prejudgment remedy had not been ordered, rather a hearing on the application for a prejudgment remedy of garnishment had been ordered; (2) the notice of rights is required only when a plaintiff’s prejudgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Fermont Division v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vecca v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992