Adams v. Grundy & Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The motion of the defendant to dismiss the suit for want of.due service of process was denied rightly. Moors v. Ladenburg, 178 Mass. 272. Perry v. Pye, 215 Mass. 403. G. L. c. 227, §§ 2, 3, 4. The defendant on denial of the motion demurred to the bill on the ground that, “no cause of action within the equity jurisdiction of the court” was stated, and that if “the plaintiff has any remedy, its remedy at law is plain, complete and adequate.”
The plaintiffs brought an action at law against the defendant to rescind a contract and recover back the purchase price they had paid for certain shipments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry v. PyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Merrill v. Cape Ann Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Abbott v. FooteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Cromwell v. ParsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Reno v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goldman v. Noxon Chemical Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Shelley v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- In Re Estate of BrowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Browning v. EikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Dobias v. FaldynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.