Ostow & Jacobs, Inc. v. Morgan-Jones, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Defendant Morgan-Jones, Inc., hereinafter Morgan-Jones, moves for reargument of its motion, which I denied, to dismiss the complaint. The motion was made on the ground that the federal court lacked jurisdiction of the claim against Morgan-Jones. Plaintiff based its opposition to the motion largely on a letter dated May 7, 1959, and I assumed in denying the motion that the claim was supported by the letter. It now appears that that letter was not written until two days after the suit was brought against Morgan-Jones and Morgan-Jones now grounds its motion for reargument…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Wappler v. Woodbury Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Spohn v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charles R. Christianson, and International Trade Services, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation v. Colt Industries Operating CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Messinger v. United Canso Oil & Gas Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Connecticut Hospital Ass'n v. PogueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Zemba v. RodgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.