Legal Opinion
Zemba v. Rodgers
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 6, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 N.J. Super. 518 (1965)
210 A.2d 95
JOSEPH ZEMBA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK J. RODGERS, RICHARD H. NAGEL, SAMUEL MOORE & CO., A CORPORATION, AND THE NYCOIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided May 6, 1965.
Mr. Frederick L. Bernstein for plaintiff (Mr. Walter H. Jones, attorney).
Mr. Donald A. Teare of the Ohio Bar for defendant Samuel Moore & Co. (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys).
MINTZ, J.S.C.
Defendant Samuel Moore & Co. (Moore) moves for dismissal of the complaint, asserting lack of jurisdiction over the person and the subject…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Plaintiff/counterclaim Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Qlt Phototherapeutics, Inc., Qlt, Inc., Counterclaim Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Evangelos S. Gragoudas, M.D., Joan W. Miller, M.D., Counterclaim Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Heath v. ZenkichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Kleinerman v. SnitzerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Mass Eye and Ear Inf v. QLT PhototherapeuticCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005