Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 1999No. Civil Action 98-617(RMU)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss;

Striking the Punitive and Compensatory

Damages and the Jury Demand from Count Three; and

Denying the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter arises under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, the Employment Retirement Income • Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, and pendent and supplemental 'claims under the District‘of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), 2A D.C.Code Ann. §§ 1-2501, et seq. (See…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Farm Bureau v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  2. Hartline v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  3. Logan v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  5. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API