Legal Opinion

In Re Klock

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1982No. Crim. 23747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, Acting P. J.

This petition seeks to set aside an extradition order by which petitioner is to be returned to New York for parole violation proceedings.

The question presented is whether a fugitive from a sister state who has signed a waiver of extradition as a condition of parole can be extradited from California without formal extradition proceedings. We conclude that under the compulsion of the holding in In re Patterson (1966) 64 Cal.2d 357 [49 Cal.Rptr. 801, 411 P.2d 897] advance waivers of extradition are ineffective in California, thus requiring that California authorities…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. In Re SatterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. State v. MaglioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. In Re KlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API