Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Kirkland
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 6, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, Chief Justice.
The statement of the ease and material faots established upon the trial contained in the brief of the counsel for plaintiff in error is not objected to as incorrect by counsel for defendants in error, and we shall therefore adopt the same as correct.
This is a suit of trespass to try title brought by the plaintiff in error in the District Court of Hill County on June 9, 1894, against the defendant in error T. A. Kirkland, for the recovery of & tract of 184£- acres of land in Hill County, patented to the heirs of John E. Cravens, deceased, assignee of John Sinclair,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- M'iver, Lessees v. RaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Williams v. PounsTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Allen v. MilleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Dozier v. EllisMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lane v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Amsler v. CavittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Yzaguirre v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Neyland v. BrammerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Stone v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.