Roberts v. State

—Appellant was prosecuted and convicted for visiting a gambling house, and his motion for a new trial was overruled. He has assigned errors (1) that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the affidavit and information; (2) that the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial. We will discuss and decide these questions in the order named. '

*367The affidavit and information rest upon §2089 Burns 1894, §2002 Horner 1897. That section defines several offenses, but when applied to the offense charged against appellant is as follows: “Whoever, being a male person, * * * frequents or…