Legal Opinion

People v. Camio

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided November 15, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bromberger, C. M.

The defendant is charged with violation of section 986 of the Penal Law. The facts, briefly, are as follows:

On October 27, 1937, on West One Hundred and Eleventh street and Eighth avenue, borough of Manhattan, New York city, the arresting officer had this defendant under observation for about ten minutes in the course of the early afternoon, during which time he saw three men variously approach and consult a scratch sheet respectively with the defendant, and thereafter, in each instance, hand the defendant money in bill form. After each of these transactions the defendant…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People Ex Rel. Sturgis v. . FallonNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People Ex Rel. Lichtenstein v. . LanganNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Matter of Application of PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Ruckman v. . PitcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MoranoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Valdez v. State Ex Rel. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. People v. ScarposiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
  5. People v. Pearsall, New York County Courts1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API