Holland v. Cofield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
lihror from District Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by Carrie Cofield against Mamie E. Holland. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Bennett on Lis Pendens, secs. 20, 21, 342, 333, 297, 299, 302, 19, 254, 224, 225, 212, 217; McCormick v. Bonfils, 9 Okla. 605-; Atherton v. Lewis, 5 Oída. 90; McFadden v. Worthington, 45 Ill. 362; Massey v. Westcott, 40 Ill. 160.; Holliday v. Bank, 16 Ohio, 534; Story, Eq.
Read the full summary
lihror from District Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by Carrie Cofield against Mamie E. Holland. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Bennett on Lis Pendens, secs. 20, 21, 342, 333, 297, 299, 302, 19, 254, 224, 225, 212, 217; McCormick v. Bonfils, 9 Okla. 605-; Atherton v. Lewis, 5 Oída. 90; McFadden v. Worthington, 45 Ill. 362; Massey v. Westcott, 40 Ill. 160.; Holliday v. Bank, 16 Ohio, 534; Story, Eq. Juris., see. 405; Hoyt v. Jones, 31 Wis. 389; Norton v..Birge, 35 Conn. 250. Citing: Bartlett v. Bartlett, 18 Mont. 446; Warnook v. Harrow, 96 Cal.…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Section 4285, Wilson’s Bev. & Ann; St. 1903 (sec. 5621, Comp. Laws 1909), provides:
“When the petition has been filed, the action is pending, so as to charge third persons with notice of its pendency, and while pending no interest can be acquired by third persons in the subject matter thereof as against the plaintiff’s title; but such notice shall be of no avail unless the summons be served or the first publication made within sixty days after the filing of the petition.”
This section was borrowed from Kansas (Comp. Laws of Kansas 1879, sec. 3608, sec. 81, Code of Civil Procedure.) In Smith v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Center v. P. & M. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Farmers' State Bank of Arkansas City v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Collingwood v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hoyt v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. WorsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stuart v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lind v. GobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Germania Nat. Bank v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Smith v. Curreather's Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- South Texas Lumber Co. v. EppsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.