Germania Nat. Bank v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by the Germania National Bank, a corporation, against F. M. Duncan, Jr., and another, in which Grace Duncan intervened, seeking the discharge of an attachment. There was a judgment for intervenor, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
The bank sued F. M. Duncan and another to recover a judgment upon a promissory note. The suit was filed in the district court of Kay county on March 24, 1915, and summons was issued on the same day, and at the same time attachment was issued in said action against the property of the defendant E. M. Duncan, and levied upon the farm in controversy hére, on March 24, 1915.
On June 4, 1915, one Grace ¡Duncan filed her motion to discharge said attachment and to release said farm therefrom, alleging that on January 22, 1915, she was the wife of E. M. Duncan, and that on said…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Thomas v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Wilkinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Vanzant v. VanzantIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Atlas Garage & Custom Builders, Inc. v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Jennings v. WysongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Panton v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.