Legal Opinion

Bensdorff v. Uihlein

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. —¥m. F. Fitzhugh, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

This is an ejectment suit brought to recover a triangular lot west .of the point of intersection of Marshall avenue and Monroe street, in the city of Memphis. The land in controversy is indicated by the letter “X’; on the diagram, and is an apex of a triangle formed at this crossing. The base of the triangle is twenty-one and one-half feet. It runs along Marshall avenue thir*195ty-seven and one-half feet, and along Monroe street forty-seven and one-half feet. The diagram follows:

The lot marked “Y” on the diagram is occupied by a building’ owned by the defendants herein. This lot came into their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Coal & Iron Co. v. CoppingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Southern Iron & Coal Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Green v. Cumberland Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wilson v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Hollywood, Inc. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Stark v. StanhopeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Peoples v. HagamanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API