Legal Opinion

Pacific Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 20, 2008No. 486, 2007PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

This insurance coverage dispute arises from separate railroad crossing accidents during a road construction project. Two wrongful death actions were fled as a result. These actions were settled but a dispute over coverage under two insurance policies remains. Defendant-Appellant Pacific Insurance Company (“Pacific”), in its own right and as assignee of plaintiff-below Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), appeals from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”) and Conrail with respect to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Winshall v. Viacom International Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. ConAgra Foods, Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Intel Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Janet Winslow Peterson and Linda Winslow Lambright v. Discover Property & Casualty Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. TREMONT LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API