Legal Opinion

ConAgra Foods, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 28, 2011No. 227, 2010PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice,

for the Majority:

This case arises from the alleged contamination in 2007 of certain Peter Pan® and Great Value® peanut butter products that Plaintiff-Below/Appellant, ConAgra Foods, Inc. (“ConAgra”), manufactured at its Sylvester, Georgia plant site. The Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) informed ConAgra that it suspected a link between a certain strain of salmonella and those peanut butter products. Thereafter, Con-Agra announced a voluntary, nationwide recall of all its peanut butter products. But, some of the peanut butter products reached consumers, and many of those…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bret Broaddus v. Kevin ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Sleep Number Corporation v. Steven YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Enrique v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Intel Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. Sherman v. State of Delaware &Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API