Legal Opinion

Rucinsky v. Hentchel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1994No. 94-153PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Elizabeth Ann Rucinsky (Rucinsky) appeals the order of the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, dismissing her invasion of privacy action pursuant to § 27-2-204, MCA. We affirm.

The sole issue presented is whether the District Court erred in granting Raymond Hentchel’s (Hentchel) motion for summary judgment on the basis that the applicable three-year statute of limitations period began to run in 1988, rather than 1992, thereby barring Rucinsky’s cause of action.

From 1986 to 1988, Rucinsky and Hentchel were in a dating relationship. In January 1988, Hentchel met Rucinsky at the Great…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Knight v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Boylan v. Van DykeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sistok v. Northwestern Telephone Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. LaCrone v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. North American Corporation of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Deserly v. Department of CorrectionsMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Bd. of Dentistry v. KandarianMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. Kananen v. SouthMontana Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API