Legal Opinion
LaCrone v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 1961No. 6698PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, P. J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition and a judgment of dismissal was entered.. This appeal results.
The material and pertinent allegations in the amended petition are:
“On or about May 11, 1960, the defendant deliberately, intentionally, willfully, unlawfully, and in reckless disregard of the rights of the plaintiff, did place a tap on plaintiff’s telephone, and, by such means did intercept and did intrude upon plaintiff’s private telephone conversations, and, by such means, did allow persons unauthorized by the plaintiff to listen to and intercept plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDaniel v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Rhodes v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- National Surety Co. v. Mansfield Lumber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928
- Poe v. Canton-Mansfield Dry Goods Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mrs. Jack D. Fowler v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Hamberger v. EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Marks v. Bell Tel. Co. of Penn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & LybrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.