Legal Opinion

Union MacHine Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1918No. Civ. No. 2222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Bernard J. Flood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon a guaranty executed by the defendant.

The appeal is without merit. The facts are briefly these: Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Western Reclamation Company to make certain repairs on and to construct new parts for a dredger. Part of the work under the contract had been performed, and plaintiff was entitled to the contract price therefor. When the balance of the work was ready for delivery the plaintiff refused to install the same until it should be paid in full for all the work. The Western Reclamation Company was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Honey v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API