Legal Opinion

Honey v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity Exchange

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1923No. L. A. No. 7281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

In this action, to recover on a policy of insurance on an automobile issued by the defendants, the plaintiff recovered judgment for $903.50 for loss occasioned by fire. Defendants appeal, claiming that their liability does not exceed the sum of $500.

Among other provisions the policy indemnified against loss or damage by collision, and covered loss or damage by fire. The maximum fire risk assumed by the insurer was limited to $1,500, in excess of $1,000 insurance permitted to be carried elsewhere. Soon after its purchase the automobile was badly damaged by collision, and the defendant paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mortgage Securities Co. v. PfaffmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Union MacHine Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ewing v. FaheyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. Parker CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API