Legal Opinion

Gumbinsky Bros. v. Smalley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greenbaum, J.:

The plaintiff is an Illinois corporation not authorized to do business in this State. The defendants are copartners. On August 15, 1919, the defendants signed a written order addressed to plaintiff “ Chicago, 111.,” and delivered it to the vice-president of the plaintiff at the Hotel Astor in the city of New York and which so far as material here reads as follows:

“ Please enter our order for the following and ship as directed below. Ship to Crocker, Burbank & Co. Association, Wachusett Station, Mass., via cheapest freight. Terms 60 days net, 1800 tons of your own packing of No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Collender v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Newhall v. . AppletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Portfolio v. . RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. People Ex Rel. Chicago Junction Railways & Union Stockyards Co. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mesibov, Glinert & Levy v. Cohen Bros. Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Gumm v. Jerry Vogel Music Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. William H. Waters, Inc. v. MarchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Lipson v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n of U. S. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Horby Realty Corp. v. Yarmouth Land Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API