Lipson v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n of U. S. A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
The action is in tort for false representation and fraud by reckless statement allegedly made by defendant upon which plaintiff relied.
Defendant, a dyer and finisher of cloth, processed clothing material for plaintiff’s vendor, Ceasor Mills, Ch. Perman & Sons, Inc. (hereafter referred to as “ Ceasor Mills ”), and *596thereafter upon direction from Ceasor Mills shipped the cloth to plaintiff affixing thereto its own labels indicating that the cloth was preshrunk. It is claimed that the word “ preshrunk ” stamped upon defendant’s hang tags annexed to the rolls of cloth delivered to plaintiff was a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Newhall v. . AppletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Gumbinsky Bros. v. SmalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Gumbinsky Bros. Company v. . SmalleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Horby Realty Corp. v. Yarmouth Land Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Rozon v. SchottensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Seroff v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Breakey v. Lake Placid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Claim of McCormack v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.