Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hagenloh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1951No. 4789PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGILL, Justice.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for damages alleged to have resulted from an assault made upon him by C. B. Houghland, a Special Officer employed by appellant, whose duty among others was to protect company property and to make investigations concerning and to recover missing and stolen property of passengers on appellant’s trains. The assault is alleged to have occurred at about nine o’clock P. M. on July 27, 1947, at Toyah, Texas. It was alleged that the assault was made by Houghland while acting within the scope of his employment with appellant, and in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lockley v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HagenlohTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. SidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Crow v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Houston Lighting & Power Company v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API