Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hagenloh

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1952No. A-3353PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

Respondent, Paul Hagenloh, filed this suit against petitioner, The Texas & Pacific Railway Company, for damage because of injuries inflicted upon him by a blow struck by C. B. Houghland. Both respondent and Houghland were employees of petitioner, respondent being a brakeman and baggageman and Houghland being a special agent.

The principal question in the case is whether Houghland, in striking respondent, was acting within the scope of his employment. The jury in answer to special issues found that when *193Houghland accosted respondent he did so in pursuance of one or more of his duties as agent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Home Telephone &. Electric Co. v. BrantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Buck v. Blum, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. Wrenn v. G.A.T.X. Logistics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Medina v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Laverie v. WetherbeTexas Supreme Court · 2017

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API