Legal Opinion

Kritzberger v. Traill County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1932No. File No. 6044PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

Tbe plaintiff alleges tbe defendant threatens to excavate-on bis land, remove bis fences and appropriate part of bis land for tbe purpose of building a road; that no road bas been laid out on tbe portion sought to be taken; and unless restrained the defendant will commit the acts threatened.

The' defendant admits it is attempting to build the road, but claims a right to enter upon the land and grade the road on the ground that for years a legal highway has been established along the quarter line of the farm — the north line of the quarter. The court found the road to be legally established to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Webb v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Burleigh County v. RhudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. President & Trustees of the Village of West Bend v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Berger v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Small v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Keidel v. RaskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Halvorson v. North Latah County Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Keidel v. RaskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API