Legal Opinion
Keidel v. Rask
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1981No. Civ. 9690-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice,
on reassignment.
This is James Rask’s second appeal to this court seeking relief from a trial court judgment declaring the width of a prescriptive road which crosses his land. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
In the previous case, the trial court found that the width of the road was 40 feet. In Keidel v. Rask, 290 N.W.2d 255 (N.D.1980), which contains the facts which we will not here repeat, we set aside that finding because it was not supported by the evidence and we sent the case back to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Stee v. "L" Monte Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Eager v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Keidel v. RaskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Barfnecht v. Town Board of Hollywood TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Patterson v. NullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lincoln Land Development, LLP v. City of LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Hartlieb v. Sawyer Township BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- McKenzie County v. ReichmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.