Legal Opinion
Estonian State Cargo & Passenger S. S. Line v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 1, 1953No. 47862PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This case is before the court on a motion by the intervenors to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the ground that the uncontroverted facts show that plaintiff has no title to the fund in question, nor any other claim arising out of the requisition by the defendant of the steamship Maret.
In both tffe original and intervening petitions it is alleged that the defendant requisitioned this vessel on or about September 6, 1941, and that in or about the month of June 1942, the defendant deposited in the Treasury of the United States $25,000 as a part of just compensation for the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baglin v. Cusenier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The MaretCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Latvian State Cargo & Passenger S.S. Line v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- The FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Exakta Camera Co. of America, Inc. v. Camera Specialty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Cargo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Estonian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956