Legal Opinion

Cargo v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1956No. 47862Published

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

On December 1, 1953, we held that the original plaintiff in this case, which had been “nationalized” by the Presidium of the Provisional Supreme Soviet of the Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic, had no title to the steamship Maret at the time it was requisitioned by the defendant, which was on September 16, 1941, 116 F.Supp. 447, 126 Ct.Cl. 809.

This case is now before the court on the petition of the intervenors, to wit, Tallinna Laevaehisus (Tallinn Shipping Company), Josep Ferdinand Maipalu, by A. Nurmiste, Mandatory, Isaak Kain, Liquidator and Administrator of the Estates…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estonian State Cargo & Passenger S. S. Line v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API