Legal Opinion

Exakta Camera Co. of America, Inc. v. Camera Specialty Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of U. S. Trademark Registrations Nos. 314,-049 and 354,241 for the trademarks Exakta and Kine Exakta respectively, brings this action for infringement. Defendants concede that they are using these trademarks in the sale of cameras. They nevertheless make this motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue of fact as to plaintiff’s lack of title.

The relevant facts are very simple. A partnership, known as Ihagee Kamerawerk Steenbergen & Co., of Dresden, Germany, prior to October 8, 1941, conducted a camera…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Petrogradsky Mejdunarodny Kommerchesky Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. John Zwack, Bela Zwack and Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Business as J. Zwack & Company v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Fred S. James & Co. v. Rossia Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. A/S Merilaid & Co. v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Omega Importing Corp. v. Petri-Kine Camera Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. International Society for Krishna Consciousness of Western Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Stadium AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Fragrancenet. Com, Inc. v. Fragrancex. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  4. Fragrancenet.com, Inc. v. Fragrancex.com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. Intern. Soc., Etc. v. Stadium Auth. of City, Etc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API