Legal Opinion
Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This stockholders’ derivative action has been settled on terms discussed in the Court’s memorandum dated November 18th, 1942, 48 F.Supp. 500. There is no need of repeating them in detail. As part of the settlement, General Motors Corporation receives $4,500,000 in cash and certain claims are reserved for further litigation, if either the Corporation or a stockholder wishes to sue thereon. In making that reservation the Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the claims or the effect of the Statute of Limitations on their enforcement. An order approving the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Beller & Keller v. Joseph Tyler, and Tyrone KindorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,733 Vera G. White, Consolidated v. Joseph Auerbach, and Manhattan Fund Inc., Mortimer G. Levine, Objectors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.