Legal Opinion

Beller & Keller v. Joseph Tyler, and Tyrone Kindor

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 21, 1997No. 1000, Docket 96-7943PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

Defendant appeals from an order entered July 3, 1996 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Patterson, /.). The order denied defendant’s motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4), to vacate, as void, the default judgment entered against him on December 19,1994.

Background

On October 21,1994, Beller & Keller (“B & K”), a New York law firm, brought this breach of contract action against Arizona residents Tyrone Kindor (“Kindor”) and Joseph Tyler (“Tyler”). Jurisdiction rested upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gold Kist, Inc. v. Laurinburg Oil Company, Inc. And McNair EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Mildred A. McLearn v. Cowen & Co. And Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. S. Stewart Crosby v. The Bradstreet Company, and L. Lloyd CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Planet Corporation v. George D. Sullivan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Old Republic Insurance v. Pacific Financial Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Central Vermont Public Service Corporation v. Harold Herbert and Edith HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API