Legal Opinion

Nicklas v. Rathburn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Tillamook: William Galloway, Judge. This is an action of trover by Dan Nicklas against S. L. Rathburn to recover $242.35 for the conversion of personal property. There was a judgment in the lower court in favor of plaintiff for $242 and the defendant appeals. In Banc.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

On November 7, 1912, the plaintiff was fishing for salmon, contrary to law, in the waters of Hoquarton Slough, a tributary of Tillamook Bay, above the intersection of said slough with the west line of section 24, township 1, south, range 10 west of the "Willamette Meridian in Tillamook County. At that time, he was so fishing with one drift net and other fishing appliances of the alleged value of $115.95. Said property belonged to the plaintiff. On the same day H. Thiesen was illegally fishing for salmon at the same place at which the plaintiff was fishing, as aforesaid, with fishing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Darst v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hey Sing Ieck v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Siverson v. ClantonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. One Chrysler Coupe v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API