Legal Opinion

Blake Construction Company, Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-5092PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, * 25 Cl.Ct. 177 (1992), awarding an equitable adjustment to Blake Construction Company, on behalf of its subcontractor Steiny and Company, Inc., for additional costs incurred under its contract with the Department of the Navy. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

Blake Construction Company contracted with the Department of the Navy to construct replacement medical facilities at the San Diego Naval Regional Medical Center. The contract called for the construction of four new structures, including a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Hills Materials Company v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. R.B. Wright Construction Co., Through Its Subcontractor, Rembrant, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. P.R. Burke Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Aleman Food Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API