Legal Opinion
R.B. Wright Construction Co., Through Its Subcontractor, Rembrant, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 20, 1990No. 90-1188PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The sole question in this case, here on appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), is whether a government contract that required the contractor to apply three coats of paint contained an implied exception for previously-painted surfaces which, according to the contractor, required only two coats. The Board held that the contract was unambiguous and required three coats. We affirm.
*1570I
A. The appellant Wright entered into three contracts with the government for miscellaneous repairs, including painting, to approximately 200 World War II-era…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- American Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- George Hyman Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Liebherr Crane Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lockheed Corporation and Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Triax Pacific, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Hills Materials Company v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Jowett, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.