Legal Opinion

Boretz v. Segar

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Under their amended complaint the plaintiffs asked the foreclosure of a purchase money mortgage on a farm. By his cross-complaint the defendant, among other claims for relief, asked that a deed of the property given subsequent to the mortgage, by the plaintiff Sadie to her husband the plaintiff Jacob, be set aside. The defendant’s fundamental claim before us is that no decree of foreclosure should have been granted, since the plaintiff Sadie, instead of recording her deed to him of the property mortgaged as agreed, fraudulently refused to do this and gave a deed of it to the plaintiff Jacob,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Gest v. GestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Lafrance v. LafranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. General Development Corp. v. BinsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Thompson v. OrcuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API