Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Penitentiary of New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1948No. 5105PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The first question raised by the appeal in this case is whether an individual may maintain an action in tort against The Penitentiary of New Mexico, a corporation, for damages.

Section 1, Article 14 of the New Mexico Constitution provides:

“The Penitentiary at Santa Fe, the Miners’ Hospital of New Mexico at Raton, the New Mexico Insane Asylum at Las Vegas, and the New Mexico Reform School at Springer, are hereby confirmed as state institutions.”

Chapter 55, Laws of 1939 (Sec. 45-101, N.M.Stats.1941 Ann.), makes the Penitentiary of New Mexico a corporate body with the right to sue…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. White v. Alabama Insane HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  5. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sangre De Cristo Development Corp. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Zellers v. HuffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. City of Albuquerque v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Livingston Ex Rel. Livingston v. Regents of the New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic ArtsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gallagher v. Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control AuthorityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API