Legal Opinion
Barnard's Heirs v. ASHLEY'S HEIRS
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 18, 1856PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
59 U.S. 43 (1855)
18 How. 43
ELIZABETH J. BARNARD, MARY A. BARNARD, CORRINE BARNARD, WILLIAM S. BARNARD, AND THOMAS BARNARD, INFANT CHILDREN AND SOLE HEIRS OF THOMAS BARNARD, DECEASED, BY WILLIAM CANNON, THEIR GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, COMPLAINANTS AND APPELLANTS,
v.
MARY W.W. ASHLEY, EXECUTRIX, AND WILLIAM E. ASHLEY, AND FRANCES A. ASHLEY, AND HENRY C. ASHLEY, AN INFANT, BY MARY W.W. ASHLEY, HIS GUARDIAN, HEIRS, &C. OF CHESTER ASHLEY, DECEASED, AND SILAS CRAIG'S REPRESENTATIVES.
Supreme Court of United States.
It was argued by Mr. Pike, for the appellants, and by Mr. Lawrence and Mr. Crittenden,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Catron.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Lytle v. the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Barnard ex rel. Cannon v. Ashley ex rel. AshleySupreme Court of the United States · 1855
3Cited by45 opinions
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Arthrex, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.