Legal Opinion

Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. WCB 85-10042; CA A42360PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant objects to the cost bill filed by employer. On the merits, we affirmed without issuing an opinion. Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 88 Or App 306, 744 P2d 1336 (1987). We deny the objection and allow costs to employer in the amount of $217.

In Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 302 Or 366, 730 P2d 540 (1986), the court held that costs on judicial review may be assessed against a claimant in a workers’ compensation case. The legislature subsequently enacted Or Laws 1987, ch 250, § 4, which amended ORS 656.236(2) by adding the emphasized language, ostensibly to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hanna v. Fairview HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API