Legal Opinion
Gevedon v. Pharma
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 17, 2002No. 02-CV-8-DCRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REEVES, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Purdue Defendants’ Motion to Deny Class Certification. This Motion will be granted because the Plaintiffs have not shown a factual basis to support certification of a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
On May 2, 2002, the Purdue Defendants2 filed the instant motion asking the Court to deny the class action proposed by the Plaintiffs. [Record No. 23] The Plaintiffs responded on May 23, 2002, and asked for 180 days to conduct limited…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Burkhead v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2008
- Sweet v. PfizerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Harris v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Wethington v. Purdue Pharma LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.